★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/002/004|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/096/002/004|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p><note>To be ommitted</note> <del>his</del> <add>the</add> conclusion is consequent. But the | |||
<lb/> | |||
same conclusion will not follow from | |||
<lb/> | |||
our Author's definiton of law: the word | |||
<lb/> | |||
is the same in both, but the Ideas are totally | |||
<lb/> | |||
different.</p> | |||
<lb> | |||
<P>Montesquieu had said, — "<foreign>L'homme comme | |||
<lb/> | |||
etre<!-- accent (hat) over the first e --> physique, est ainsi que les <sic>autrescorps</sic><!-- two words, but Bentham has written as one -->. | |||
<lb/> | |||
gouverne<!-- Bentham has written an accent over last e, but actually none should be written in reality. Should you add the accent and add to list of irregular spellings, or ommit the accent and assume flaw in knowledge or simply a mistake? --> par des loix invariables:— | |||
<lb/> | |||
comme etre<!-- accent (hat) over first e --> intelligent, il viole sans cesse | |||
<lb/> | |||
les loix qui Dieu a etablies<!-- forward slash over first e --></foreign>." Our author | |||
<lb/> | |||
<add>following the general idea of his leader,</add> did not attend to this distinction, but | |||
<lb/> | |||
reducing man to the simple State of <add>a</add> Physical | |||
<lb/> | |||
being, has left him no more choice <add>no more free-agency</add> than | |||
<lb/> | |||
<sic>assurtains</sic> to a Stone, or a piece of timber. <add>"The</add></p><lb> | |||
<head> | |||
<unclear>17</unclear></head> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
To be ommitted his the conclusion is consequent. But the
same conclusion will not follow from
our Author's definiton of law: the word
is the same in both, but the Ideas are totally
different.
<lb>
Montesquieu had said, — "L'homme comme
etre physique, est ainsi que les autrescorps.
gouverne par des loix invariables:—
comme etre intelligent, il viole sans cesse
les loix qui Dieu a etablies." Our author
following the general idea of his leader, did not attend to this distinction, but
reducing man to the simple State of a Physical
being, has left him no more choice no more free-agency than
assurtains to a Stone, or a piece of timber. "The
<lb>
17
|
Identifier: | JB/096/002/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
096 |
comment on the commentaries |
||
|
002 |
|||
|
004 |
|||
|
collectanea |
4 |
||
|
recto |
c11 f2 / c12 / c13 / c14 |
||
|
168 |
[[watermarks::gr [quartered royal arms motif]]] |
||
|
[[notes_public::"to be omitted" [note not in bentham's hand]]] |
31006 |
||
