★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
---page break---
36 C
Of Confinement
Recapitulation — grand distinction to be attended to. The judge therefore in estimating the mischief of
this offence and measuring out the quantum for it it's
proper share of punishment will have his eye to two
principal cases. The first is where it either
involves in it's progress or terminates
in a distinct offence having it's own proper
nature characterized by it's own proper denomination
name. The other is where it neither does not involves
nor or terminates in any such offence. In the
first case he will punish it as well in it's own
footing as in the footing of such additional
offence: in the other case he will punish
it on it's own footing merely.
The above analysis is not so distinct
compleat and accurate as it might have been.
To render it perfectly so, the offence in question
should have been consider'd separately with respect
to every separate distinguishable species of
obnoxious effect in which by possibility it could
terminate. An Such a perfect analysis it might possibly be worth
while to frame were it designed to enter into the
composition of an authoritative a code which was
to be invested with authority. In the mean time
this rough outline may suffice together with a
few of the most common obvious cases by way of examples
may suffice. To p. 39
Identifier: | JB/071/124/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 71. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
7-11 |
|||
071 |
penal code |
||
124 |
of confinement |
||
004 |
|||
text sheet |
4 |
||
recto |
f33 / f34 / f35 / f36 |
||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::s. lay [britannia with shield emblem]]] |
||
alexander mavrokordatos |
|||
23527 |
|||