★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Previous Contract Connect & Observd
Previous Contract
C before 12
1
Impossible that the
ambiguity in the
Minute should not
be the result of the
imputed fraud. —
2
Even independently
of the account given
to me by Harrison
of the recommendation
given by him.
C. before 13
1
Whites first reason
for refusing to
draw the Contract.
2
Insufficiency of the
covering. —
---page break---
Previous Contract
C before 14
1
Long's Letter (C13)
inclosing Minute
about Previous Contract
— how obtained
by J.B. He had
expressed an impatience
to see
the business finished
& on the occasion
of Wise's Land.
2.
I asked him for
the communication
as with a view
to Wise's Land.
3.
— but meaning on
that request to ground
on another for another
letter, to answer
the purpose
of a Previous Contract
to proceed on the Chapter
to treat for the
land. —
4
Importance of this
evidence towards
the detection of the
Treasury plan of
perfidy — It was
Long's thoughtlessness
that furnished me
with it.
5.
When the second
letter was applied
for — Long would not
give it — probably
on the suggestion
of Rose. —
---page break---
Marginal Contents 2
Connect Observs Previous Contract C
Previous Contract
After C 17.
1
Result — no Previous
Contract —yet no
decision refusing it.
Another year
thereby lost: —
2.
In this single transaction
a conclusive
demonstration was
afforded of perfidy
operating through
anarchy.
3.
No assurance how
solemn soever — and
though given through
the Board itself —
could thereafter be
justly stated as a
safe dependance.—
4.
Course taken by the
business — in respect
of the completion of
the purchase so far
as the interest of
the Vendor was concerned.
Insufficiency of the
original Act (34 G.
3. c. 84) as to the
assignment of a fund.
5
The Civil List has
been mentioned as
applicable — and actually
applied — to
this business. —
6.
Thirty thousand pounds
had been announced
to me as a sum
intended to be applied
for that year to Parliament
with an
eventual addition from
the Civil List. —
7.
The following memorandum
given in by me to Mr
Long to remind him of
the purposes & thence
of the sum requisite.
---page break---
Previous Contract
After C. 21—
1.
The payment was
not made to J.B.
as it should have
been according to
the Act. —
2.
The irregularity
was Rose's — the motives
for it were not understood
by J.B. at
the time — it seemed
to him no more
than another insult —
instead of a contrivance
for doing
L<hi rend='underline'>d</hi> Salisbury's business
instead of that
of the Establishment.
3
Concert and compleat
explanation, among
all the parties to
this fraud, were
not necessary to the
accomplishment of it.
4.
Pitt no otherwise
concerned than as
Henry 2d in the
murder of Becket.
5.
White could understand
from a hint
from Rose or even
from his indifference
— that he wished the
establishment to be
obstructed. —
6.
He could not but
expect him to obstruct
it through
incapacity unless
assisted. —
---page break---
Previous Contract
7
He would have
assisted him in it
if he had wished
it success. —
8.
He took an active
part in getting
that done which
he wished to see
done — viz the payment
of the money
to Ld Salisbury
without the Establishment
being the
better for it —
9
Fruitless endeavours
on the part of J.B.
to get the Dean and
Chapter to capitulate
by apprizing them
of the execution of
the conveyance. —
10.
The Dean has probably
received assurances
from the Treasury that
the purchase would
never be put in use.
11.
Long's account to JB
of the angry attack
made on him by
the Dean. They had
probably been reconciled. —
12
Capitulation not
obtainable. —
|
Identifier: | JB/116/444/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1-2, 1-2, 1-5, 1-7, 1-12 |
|||
|
116 |
panopticon versus new south wales |
||
|
444 |
[[info_in_main_headings_field::previous conduct connectd[?] observs marginal contents]] |
||
|
001 |
previous contract |
||
|
marginal summary sheet |
2 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
john herbert koe |
cw 1799 |
||
|
c. abbit lees |
|||
|
1799 |
|||
|
37977 |
|||
