★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
10 Inserenda
Observations
V. Procedure
§
Penalty of Impris't
6 7
A perfect mode
would here be premature
To remedy this deficit (if such it may be
stiled) in the system of summary procedure
As the deficit here in question (if such it
may now be stiled) is one that pervades the whole system
of summary procedure, to apply an adequate
remedy to it would require a provision extending
over the whole [expanse of that branch of procedure
ground] of the ground occupied by that
system: But a provision so general in its extent of that extent could not
would not any [to this effect could
not if it were to be this general in its extent ]
be stationed with any propriety in the present be stationed <add> introduced in the present
Bill or any other Bill: and the change would
be apt to appear of too important a nature that did not by the title of it give intimation of such extent:
to be introduced slipped in as it were sub silentis amongst
in the amongst the clauses of
that come in as of course at the in the train
of every Bill the execution of which is made
to rest in any part on the system of summary
procedure. On a preceding occasion
viz: that of the clause in which provision was
made for preventing the receipts from
being much in the hands of the Receivers, this
reserve was not regarded as necessary: [in the
first place] because the co the resolution was then
the sole object, punishment forming no part of
it: in the next place because the field of jurisprudence summary
procedure on civil grounds in civil matters is so extremely narrow
in comparison of what it is in penal matters
|
Identifier: | JB/150/705/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
7 |
|||
|
150 |
police bill |
||
|
705 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d10 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
g & ep 1794 |
||
|
fr3 |
|||
|
1794 |
|||
|
50926 |
|||
