xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/007/074/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Ready for review. Submitted by Phil.fawcet

Click Here To Edit

26 Apr. 1816 58
Cat.

Append. III
Dean Andrews
2. Vansittart
Further Papers
Excise stigmatized

5

9
Note 2. Of the
conflicting Boards
if what the one says
is deserving of regard
what the other says
is not.

By independent Excise which is
regularly competent,
application for ex
declared groundless.

By dependent Treasury
to which for obvious
purposes Parliament
has been made to
give concurrent jurisdiction,
no more
regard paid to what
comes from Excise
than if from Hulks.

Now moreover that of the two conflicting Boards the
dependent and the independent one on enquiry not altogether
unworthy of esteem is whether in the nature of
things it be possible that if what is said by the one
has any claim to regard, it be possible that any thing
that is said or done by the other should have any such claim.
Four times grounding themselves on regular evidence the Excise
Board within to whose competence the matter cause properly and
originally belongs, declare the application made for mitigation the application
or exemption altogether groundless. The dependent
Board which for causes too palpable for palpably obvious to need mentioning
has made the two Houses give them as to the matter a jurisdiction
concurrent with that of the Excise Board — what tokens of regard
does it pay to those regular and necessary representations?
from the independent Board? altogether as much as
if the Hulk and not an independent Board had
been the quarter from which they came.

10
Sole supposition on
which the possession
and exercise of Treasury
jurisdiction can be
palliated, Excise altogether
untrustworthy

The Tr
Excise Board is it then such a mass of corruption
that nothing no statement that ever comes to it has any the smallest
claim to regard notice? Let any one say whether on any
supposition other than this, the conduct of the dependent
Board can be justified or so much as palliated.

11
One or other a nuisance.

Of these two Boards the dependent and the independent
either the one or the other must be a perfect
nuisance.

12
Evidence on which
Excise acts not ex
against if
the only evidence on
which Treasury acts
shape declared and
justly by Excise untrustworthy
and indefensible.

Take notice that if the evidence on which the independent
Board all along acts the shape may at any rate have
been trustworthy: nor does any thing appear to the contrary ground appear for supposing it to have been otherwise
whereas the evidence on which the dependent Board grounds the
it upon the independent Board is essentially
un
extrajudicial and
only
and if their
notice is on each occasion sounded in their ears.



Identifier: | JB/007/074/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 7.

Date_1

1816-04-26

Marginal Summary Numbering

9-12

Box

007

Main Headings

church of englandism

Folio number

074

Info in main headings field

cat

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c5 / d58

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

<…>co

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

a. levy

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

3018

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk