xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/014/061/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

9 Sept 1814 5

Logic or Ethics Ch Summum bonum

2 § 1 Platonists & Academics

The God of the Christians Paul appears as no man body ever saw, Easter times, but
The God of he whom is the with what sense of enjoyment?
Of the God of the Jews no man but Moses ever knew any part, and that he but the hinder part
and if here was sight, where was the enjoyment?

Nonsense in general — or at least this nonsense in particular is like an oil:
when you think you have it fast, it slips through your fingers
and in comes another lot of nonsense in the stead of it

After giving you for the summum bonum of these philosophers
[the Platonists and the Academics] the idea of good
as if this were not unintelligible enough, in the same breath, in the same sentence, and in the very next words Instruction, in comes the compared-maker
with a sivi — "sivi vision et fructiam Dei"
that is to say understand in the vision and fruition — the Dei seeing
and enjoying of God.

Here if there were any thing, there could be two things,
vision as seeing of God one thing, enjoying of God, another
thing: and this same idea of good, what has either of them to do with it.

Enjoying a person of the same species and the opposite
sex — this is sufficiently intelligible enough: but this is of the number
of these things in which, as we are expressly every body says who ever talked about the summum
bonum is altogether clear
the summum bonum is not to
be found: and so in this case as to instance of a mass of turtle or a
pine-apple. But God? enjoyment of God? what sort of an
enjoyment is that? by whom was it ever experienced. As
to the God — the God here spoken of — and though here it we are
given to understand there is but one God, so he is neither
the God of the Jews, nor the God of the Christians who each
of these had but one — and he, as they say, as the Christians
at least say the same — but the God of the Platonists and
the Academics — all of them heathens, all of them having Gods by
thousands.




Identifier: | JB/014/061/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14.

Date_1

1814-09-09

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

014

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

061

Info in main headings field

logic or ethics

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d5 / e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] mj&l 1811]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

colonel aaron burr

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1811

Notes public

ID Number

4824

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk