JB/015/058/001

Click Here To Edit

28 June 1816
Polit. Deontology

Wil it be under Utility as above explained, or in other
words happiness as though it be on the largest scale ought
not on this occasion to be taken for the principal standard
– is at any rate not for the sole standard. Justice has
Equal or more superior to utility justice has its claims.

To this there are two answers.

1. The first is – that but in virtue by with measure of its reference to at
its subservience to utility i.e. to happiness justice the
thing meant by justice has no virtue: were the to no, nor
the word justice any intelligible signification. And But for
this see further on.

2. The other is – that even supposing that to the exclusion
or in preference is in coordination with utility justice
be assumed for the standard or propriety, it will even be
the same thing: for it it be justice that is to regulate the distribution
of happiness in a community of individuals at
what number short of the whole can you find any
reason for dipping?

Identifier: | JB/015/058/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 15.
Date_1	1816-06-28	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	015	Main Headings	deontology
Folio number	058	Info in main headings field	polit. deontology
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c2
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	john dickinson & c<…> 1813
Marginals		Paper Producer	a. levy
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1813
Notes public		ID Number	5274
Box Contents