★ Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
12 May 1815
Chrest. Tab. II Concl Genealogical
21
Mode of Exercitation
Given the Tables —
viz. one expressing
the enuntiative parts
of the propositions verbally,
the other, diagrammatically, —
required to express
extempore, orally
or scriptitiously
the references
In this a case as in every other, the application
made of the exercises supported with the by the place capturing principle
for their support will be determined by the nature of
the particular object to be accomplished. Having for his
gender, the Table corresponding pair of Tables viz. one with containing
the proposition (the enuntiation) parts) verbally expressed
the other with the same diagrammatically expressed, both of
them without any of the references by which the filiation is
indicated, to perform the exercises the Scholar writes the references
the Exercise is performed either by the extempore
pronuntiation or by the extempore writing, of the references.
Given the Briefly thus — Given the Kites, required the Tails.
By a systemcourse of exercitation thus conducted, the 22
Thus would be
obtained a more
comprehensive
and commanding
view of the chain
reasoning that
by its demonstration
alone, is
in which demonstration
is
from every
object to which the attainment of the process of demonstration in form is
would, it is believed, be not only attained, but attained
in a much more perfect degree. By the form of demonstration
the enuntiation what is brought to view is
the connection between that individual proposition, and
those on which it depends more immediately — that, and nothing more
But by this system of genealogy the what is brought
to view is the connection between each such proposition
and every other. In the one case you have first one
part by itself, then another part by itself; and so on; in the 24
Conceditive at
the form that
strictly observed
<note> in a distance graph.
But
Once thoroughly understood
it may with
prejudices to
be described
other case all the parts together are part together into
one connected whole.
At the outset, at any rate, the enuntiative part, the
preparatory part and the demonstration part, being distinguished
as above, in the forms of the demonstrative the forms of the demonstration
might and should be strictly observed in the preparatory as well as the demonstrative part, each distinguishable
step being carefully distinguished from every other, and for that purpose
formed into a distinct paragraph. But, the mode of reasoning being once thoroughly understood
there seems as not
sooner or later, the
forms, by which so much room is occupied, might it is supposed be discarded without prejud to intellective, be discarded.
Identifier: | JB/018/051/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 18.
|
|||
---|---|---|---|
1815-05-12 |
21-22, 24 |
||
018 |
chrestomathia |
||
051 |
chrest. tab. ii conclusion |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
c5 / e6 |
||
jeremy bentham |
|||
6460 |
|||