xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/023/003/002

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

Constitutional Code.

1. 2d Chr. Senate Delay
U.S. Senate attributes
purely mischievous – in
respect of delay & expense
mischievous by the amount
of those effects.

2. 2d Chr. Senate Useless
Benefit none.

3. 2d Chr. Senate Data?
For a debtor & creditor
account data wanting.
Heads the following –<p>1. 2d Chr. Senate Delay
U.S. Senate attributes
purely mischievous – in
respect of delay & expense
mischievous by the amount
of those effects.

2dChr I. Delay
1. Acts come before the
Senate List.
2. Acts rejected, List.
3. Acts passed
1. No. of days in House
of Representatives.
2. do. in Senate.</p>

4. 2d Chr. Senate Data?
Heads in relation to
which long acquaintance
with proceedings necessary.
1. Bills rejected never
brought forward again
effects good & bad.
2. So as to amendments
made.

5. 2d Chr. Senate Data?
Objection will the profit
of the inquiry be adequate
to the trouble.

6. 2d Chr. Senate Data?
Answer yes the inquiry
indispensable because
delay & expense
of Senate are evils
sensible & incontrovertible.

7. 2d Chr.
Onus of producing
Data lies on the approvers
of the Senate.


---page break---

25. Hispanicé Data useful?
Plan for forming a
well-grounded estimate
of the balance on the
side of good or evil
from a Second Chamber
taking U.S. for example.
Examine and class
the Laws &c passed from
the establishment of
the Legislative body of
the Union


---page break---

(3)

1. Model England
Cause of the adaption
Authority-begotten prejudice.

2. Model England
Of all forms of Government
then known the English the best.

3. Model England
In England were two houses –
therefore two house adopted
in U.S.

4. Model England
then why not a King? because
they considered themselves
as rebels against the King
not against the Lords.

5. Model England
In truth Lords' interest
more opposed to that of the
people than the King's.

6. Model England
Suposed superior wisdom
of the Lords.

7. Model England
The contrary is the fact.

8. Model England
But said U.S. legislator,
in England Lords were
hereitary & named
by the King here they
are though by means
of intermediate authority
named by the people.

9. Model England
This true to a degree but
not to a sufficient degree.

10.
Cause 2d. self-sufficiency
with distrust of others.

11.
Persons kept in leading
strings not the electors,
but the select few located
by them.


Identifier: | JB/023/003/002
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 23.

Date_1

1829-11-17

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-16

Box

023

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

003a
"a" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 3.

Info in main headings field

constitutional code us

Image

002

Titles

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d6 / f7

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

b&m 1828

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1828

Notes public

ID Number

7874

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk