JB/028/035/002

Click Here To Edit

Interpretation + Construction. offset of which is to exemplify him, in which is in front
[according as the doubt reflects the facts of countenance and,
the definition of this offence on our head, or the decora-
-tion of the franchisement on the other] as the case
is: from suffering.
When the guilt of the offender is not in question
but merelythe prosperity of the mode of changing it [of
the form of accusation] of the allegations made
or steps taken to hang him to franchisement, then
the Judge should have no such Laws.
In other words
Where the doubt outfitsapplication ofthe Principal or SubstantiveLaw
over whether the matter or the matter of fact: the matter of how viz:other
the establishment of the sort of offence or the sort of punish-
-ment: which he is charged with is the matter of fact: viz. his leaving done
the individualact he is charged with, and which he has
are an individual act of the sort of that offence,
and to the sort of offence which is to draw after
it on individual act of a franchisement of the sort of that punishment
than the accused should be furnished
that when the doubt affectsthe respects the application of a
regulation of the Adjective or Subsidizing kind, when the matter
of Law or the matter of fact, there the accused ought
to meet with no favour.
Exemplify when the distributor between the matter of
fact and the matter of Law

Identifier: | JB/028/035/002 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 28.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	028	Main Headings	comment on the commentaries
Folio number	035	Info in main headings field	interpretation & construction
Image	002	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	/ b2 / f3 /
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] propatria [britannia motif]]]
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	9300
Box Contents