JB/028/071/002

Click Here To Edit

Sect. Parts of a Law. (21

We can come to the remedial part: "and this"
we are in the first place told, is so necessary
a consequence of the other two, that laws must
be very vague and imperfect without it. "Vague"
— agreed — but would they or would they not
be laws?— Imperfect that is a little more
precise, from thence. I conclude that if an in—
hument or discourse have not thus part, it is according to the author
not a no law. "For in vain", continues he, "would
right be declared, in vain could directed to be
obscured, if there were a method of reasoning
and parting these right (method present by the
law I suppose he means) when wrongfully
"withheld" [withholden] "or invaded. True laws
may be vain; but yet they may be laws. further defining that he use as definition He
pays us with declaration. Not that all laws are
necessarily vain, neither, that have method belonging to are unimproved with the method.
For their are cases "when "shame" (as an
elegant counter phrases it) where shown "I say
follows the finger of the law! How this "shame"which us the ill—will of those a man has to deal with, or else the apprehension of that ill—will
or of disorder which produced ill—will, is what

Remedial
---page break---

Identifier: | JB/028/071/002 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 28.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	028	Main Headings	comment on the commentaries
Folio number	071	Info in main headings field	[[info_in_main_headings_field::sect. [ ] parts of a law]]
Image	002	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	f20 / b21 / f22 / b23
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] propatria [britannia motif]]]
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	9336
Box Contents