JB/028/108/002

Click Here To Edit

18)

Construction

indirect manner. Yet But they set about the work
made (for any things they imagined) precisely
in the same situation with the first set, not
knowing that any body had been beforehand with them. Now
it would have been strange, if two sets of
Legislators, going to work without any communication
with each other, and both meaning to appoint
a Qualification, should both have happen'd
to pitch exactly upon the same Sum.
As it happened chanced, the Sum the last set pitched
upon was the smallest. But what is plain
is, that of neither to of these any more than the
first set was it the intention to reduce it:
For if it had been, it is not credible but they
would have said so. Now therefore not being in as it was not
their intention to reduce it, [what] upon warrant
can have a Judge [have to] determine as if it
had been? They both say that less than
the sums they respectively mention shall
not be sufficient: but they neither of them say does the one more
But make any greater sum sufficient any otherwise
than by saying nothing to the contrary. Now often
the passing of the last Statute

Identifier: | JB/028/108/002 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 28.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	028	Main Headings	comment on the commentaries
Folio number	108	Info in main headings field	construction of statutes
Image	002	Titles	note
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	f17 / b18 / f19 / b20
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] propatria [britannia motif]]]
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	9373
Box Contents