JB/028/110/001

Click Here To Edit

25)

Construction

to be meant by the usage the having recourse to the
dead Statute and using the term revival, is to
to take it as being already penned instead of and already known in some
Bill in some degree or other known, to save the
trouble of a new Bill.

Thus much as to the matter of fact:⊞ ⊞ How What whether it is to the expectation of, of itself is taking to be upon the occasion? concerning
which I speak without any very strong degree of
attachment to the side I see reason to embrace.
The Question of Utility⊞ ⊞ what it were if not that it should be made to be? will admitt I think
of something reasons more decisive

In the first place thus much is manifest; that the
indirect method of revival has can have no advantage over
the direct one: it is as easy to say, that such a Statute
shall be revived, as that such another shall
be repealed. And it has these disadvantages.

What sort of compositions our Statues many of them are,
is but too visible: how voluminous their contents, how
undigested, how multifarious. A hundred long Sections
is no unusual number for a Statute to consist of.
In such a mass a short clause repealing a former Statute

Identifier: | JB/028/110/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 28.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	028	Main Headings	comment on the commentaries
Folio number	110	Info in main headings field	construction
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	f25 / b26 / f27 / b28
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] propatria [britannia motif]]]
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	9375
Box Contents