JB/028/138/004

Click Here To Edit

4)

Common Law. Judicial Decisions.

known by them to [the] 8 millions of people [who are
concerned to know them]

NOTE

So says that illustrious criminal, whose history of the
transactions of the King's Bench does so much honour
to himself and to those Judges whom he has treated
with contempt. This If it be a mistake, is not his
mistake alone. I have am one of a hundred,
who have heard, & that more than once or I am much mistaken,
the same declaration full & in open Court from the mouth of the Chief
Judge. By what preposterous constitution of things
is it, that that a proposition aperture so paradoxical and seemingly
to appearance contradictory, should yet be true?

How right they? By At least by being printed and
published by the authority of the Judges. But of
this we shall see more hereafter.

The next question to which the answer applies is "by
whom is their validity to be determined? No manner Here to
have not make any thing like sense of the answer, we must
[once more] change the subject of the question: we must lay aside
judicial acts, and suppose it to apply to Customs
in pays proposed to be legalized: and then but not otherwise the answer
is intelligible and proper, "by" (not now "by
"means of" but by) the Judges in the several Courts
of Justice. It is plain that at this time he considers

Identifier: | JB/028/138/004 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 28.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	028	Main Headings	comment on the commentaries
Folio number	138	Info in main headings field	common law judicial decisions
Image	004	Titles	note
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	b1 / e2 / b3 / e4
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::[monogram] [britannia emblem]]]
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	9403
Box Contents