xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/028/140/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

9)

Common Law. Judicial Decisions.

This exception we are to understand is

Yet this rule, and he says, admitts of exception, where the
former determination now is most evidently contrary
to reason; much more if it be contrary to the divine Law.
Now what is to be most evidently contrary to reason? when is
it that a determination is most evidently contrary to
reason? Let others answer as they please; for my part
I will speak plainly, and confess that with me to be
most evidently contrary to reason, is to be most evidently
contrary my reason; viz: to what I like. Perhaps I might go farther
and add, apprehending it at the same time to be contrary
to what would be liked by others, being in a situation to
apprehend be apprized of the circumstances that are in the case. But
the most prompt and perhaps the most usual translation
of the phrase "contrary to reason", is "contrary to what I
like. This rule then is the rule that which the our Author
has found to give a Judge to whom a preceding determination
is proposed. Follow it says he, unless it
is most evidently contrary to what you do not like. And
is this then the only general rule that can be given?
I much fear it is; at least no better has even been
given yet.

Our Author may perhaps demur to this, and say we have
done him an injustice. If so, I will beg him to consider
[a little] his rule a little further and think what other more precise construction he
can possibly put upon it. The prior determination
is to be most evidently contrary to reason. that is at To whose
reason? To every body's? No that can not be. For to the


Identifier: | JB/028/140/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 28.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

028

Main Headings

comment on the commentaries

Folio number

140

Info in main headings field

common law judicial decisions

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

b9 / e10 / b11 / e12

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[monogram] [britannia emblem]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

9405

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk