xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/028/161/003

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

7)

Common Law. Particular Customs. Rules

Littleton will afford us an example. Ch. 10, Sect. 167. From him we learn In his tome he
tells us that by Custom in some Boroughs a man might
dispose of his lands by Will.[a] [a] For the note see Inserenda p. No. This custom we may be
sure could not have been in it's origin spontaneous.
In this custom, the Heir was the party burthen'd.
The Heir then we may be sure or we hardly suppose would never
Whensoever it happened that a man first attempted this
disposition, the Heir having been used to look upon His expect the
Estate, to look upon it as that which was to be his after the death
of that his Ancestor, we can hardly suppose would sit still
and see it thus strangely given away from him.

At the utmost If one Heir by some particular circumstances might
be induced thus spontaneously to acquiesce, one can hardly it is impossible to suppose it
of a number of Heirs one after another. Litigation
must therefore have ensued. The question dispute must have
been carried before the tribunal of the place: that Tribunal
must have decided in favour of the Divorcee.

This decision then must have been the beginning
of the custom. If this decision could have been shewn
when first the question came before the superior Judi
King's Courts, the beginning of the custom could have
been shewn. The Custom then, if this rule had at that time taken
place, must have been deemed a bad one.

Once more as to the sort of memory which if it "run
"to the contrary of a custom" destroys the "goodness" of it.
Upon what sort of evidence is it rested? to in partic Is oral
evidence solely, as is wr alone to be admitted to establish or overthrow it,
or is written evidence also to be admitted. If oral
evidence, is that only which is direct eviden to be admitted, or is hearsay also
to be admitted? None of these obvious and necessary questions are resolved by the


Identifier: | JB/028/161/003
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 28.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

028

Main Headings

comment on the commentaries

Folio number

161

Info in main headings field

common law particular customs - rules

Image

003

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

b5 / e6 / b7 / e8

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[monogram] [britannia symbol]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

9426

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk