JB/028/172/004

Click Here To Edit

8)

the case, the Plff it is plain, loses it's his cause.
A Prohibition can only help the Deft. when the opinion of the Superior
Court is in favour of the Defendant: To help
the Plff I doubt we must have another and
opposite sort of a thing called a Mandamus.
The party that is favoured by excess of a Court's exceeding its Jurisdiction,
must be the Plaintiff. Is then the case, so that the
superior Court of Common Law corrects erroneous judgment given upon a
Statute by these Ecclesiastical Civil Law Courts whether given for Plaintiff or Defendant, or
that if given for the Defendant it leaves the error
to be redressed by the another Tribunal? for Appeal. If the former
be the case, it is not by prohibition only that
they operate. If the latter they cannot be said it is too much to say
they have reserved the exposition even the definitive exposition of Acts of Parliament
to themselves.

Identifier: | JB/028/172/004 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 28.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	028	Main Headings	comment on the commentaries
Folio number	172	Info in main headings field	common law law roman
Image	004	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	b5 / e6 / / e8
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::[monogram] [britannia symbol]]]
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	9437
Box Contents