xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/030/039/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

1828 Oct. 3
Civil CodeCh. Obligatory dealings

☞ Antecedently to the application of the greatest
happiness principle, needs acceptance
following principle, the arrangement
of them are made as it were by blind instinct,
as in the case of .

Invalidation = Deobligation nor disobligation.

Cause of invalidity – original invalidity
Mental Infirmity on the part of the conveyer. In This case
are included those sub cases. 1.
1. Certainty and Universally applying: 2. each viz. minority immaturity. 2.
contingently applying – 1. Infirmity through superannuation.
2. Infirmity through insanity or say mental derangement. Of these two cases superannuation is the most
simple. In the case of insanity, the state of the mind
infinitely diversified are the modifications which in this
case are exemplified.

The case In comparison of the two other cases – even that of insanity not
excepted, the case of relative superannuation is a case of unfrequent
occurrence. Post-obituary
dispositions are
those the consequences in relation
to which its occurrence
is most frequent.

Case the first immaturity. This stands distinguished
from the two others, by the certainty of its extinction in
case of correspondent continuance of life: and in the circumstance
may be seen a correspondent difference in the appropriate
arrangements

In all these cases, is under the laws of all countries
with few or no exceptions, there has the invalidation
has been absolute or say unconditional and
entire: between validity and invalidity no medium.
But when the rational cause of invalidation is considered
it will be seen that the invalidation is susceptible of
modification, and with widely extending practical benefit
in practice. This cause is – loss of property to in
indefinite proportion, or even entire compleat, on the part of the
proposed conveyer, with disappointment correspondent in
proportion: in one word in the law language actually in use – lexicon. But by appropriate and apt modifications the need and use of
such lexicon may in cases to no small extent be excluded
and thence the need and use of such invalidation may to a considerable extent, be removed.

By the simple expedient of recourse to the authority
from and service of a Judge this term may effectually
be excluded.


Identifier: | JB/030/039/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 30.

Date_1

1828-10-03

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

030

Main Headings

civil code

Folio number

039

Info in main headings field

blackstone or civil code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

b&m 1828

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1828

Notes public

ID Number

9546

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk