xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/037/403/002

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

1823. Oxrr. 29
Constitutional CodeCh. Appellate Judges
§. Options

At Immediate refute evidence may be
before said Depute &c if both agree

Art. 7 6. In case of retention declared expression tact, as above,
at the
thereupon follows either retransmission accompanied with one of the above mentioned
five operations as above, one one or other the two operations
and corresponding following

1. Imperative decree ordering further argument before
the Appellate Judicature

2. Imperative decree ordering further evidence to be secured particularized
or exracted by the
3. Imperative decree ordering further recapitulatory
examination.

Art. 7. In case of If the decree be for further argument, the
and no one of either of the two other decrees be added to it, the
Judicatory in which it the argument is heard is the Appellate Judicatory:
which argument heard, the Appellate Judicatory takes one of pursues
the several other makes retransmission of the record
accompanied with the a d an imperative degree to one or other of the four six effects abov just
mentioned.

Art. 9. If the decree be for further evidence the transmission retransmission
Judicatory to which the transmission retransmission is performed is may
be either the Immediate Judicatory as appealed from or some other Immediate
Judicatory, as more little remote from the abodes of parties and extraneous
witnesses as may conveniently be.

Art. 10. Regularly In general and without special reason to the contrary
it will be before some other Judicatory namely unless the Appeal was with reasons: namely br some other
Judicatory within the local field of the Appellate jurisdiction of
the Appellate Judicatories.

Art. In the of relation to this succedaneum Judicatory, the choice
of the Appellate Judicatory will be determined by the all embracing consideration
a maximization of security against misdecision: minimization
of delay vexation and expence: pecuniary and other
of the parties on both sides taken into account.


Identifier: | JB/037/403/002
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 37.

Date_1

1824-08-23

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

037

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

403

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d7

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1822

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

jonathan blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1822

Notes public

ID Number

11618

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk