xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/019/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

1826. Feby.. 28.
Constitutional Code. 12 1839. May 19.
1828 .Aug 24
Ch. XI. Ministers Severally.
12 §.2.11. Legislation Minister
Rationale

Used
Ratives


Art 20 [Rejected. Dropt] Reasons for the rejection dropping of Art Reasons for dropping
note symmetricalated
amendments.
In Judges hands
this initiative is in the
most apt hands

amendments in any other than the proposed symmetrical
form.

1. In the case where the proposed amendment is
the work of a Judge, by whom, as per Ch. XII. Judiciary
Collectively,
S.20. Eventually emendative function,
indication of a supposed demand for amendment
has, in the exercise of such his functions been made,-
the task of giving expressions to the amendment, on the
supposition of it's being desireable, is placed in hands
best situated, for the giving to it the requisite properties
of clearness, correctness, all-comprehensiveness,
and conciseness; and, on the part of the legislature,
much waste of time <add><hi rend="superscript">is</add> saved.</hi>

Art37.iv.=25.2 Under this condition, added to that of the tion Instructional Ratiocinative<add>Not for Netherlands but </add>Instructional Ratiocinative,
given to the proposed amendment by the motion Note On this condition
persons at large may
Art7 In without
note a
(viz. the instruction)
in legislation

of one Member seconded by another as per Ch. VI. Legislature §.29. Member's Motions, a sort of share
in legislation is capable of being imparted- not only
to Ministers-Members as they are of the Legislative
body, as to every right but that of voting,-but also
to persons at large considered as member of the Constitutive:
And this, too, without preponderant inconvenience.
See Ch. XII. Judiciary Collectively §.19. Judges'
contested interpretation-reporting junction: §.20.
Judges' eventually-emendative function: §.21. Judges'
Sistitive function: §.22. Judges' preinterpretative function

Art.


---page break---



Identifier: | JB/042/019/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1826-02-28

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

019

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d12 / e12

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

jeremy bentham; sir john bowring

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

"used"

ID Number

12942

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk