xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/212/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

1828 Sept 13
Constitutional Code

(12a) Ch 11 Judiciary Collectively
§ 2. Actors
Copd.

Between the sort of business belonging to the Special Pleader
under the Bar and the sort belonging to be Special pleader at the Bar,
no faint line of demarcation has place. On each individual occasion, the
maker for the instrument is taken to be manufactured at the lower priced on
the higher priced manufactory, according as less or more head work is
regarded as necessary to the operation.

Exemplificational.

Art. 20. In the sort of judicatory stated an Equity Court,
superfluous evidence Elecitator in the written form, an Equity Draughtsman;
at the Bar or under the Bar, as also above. But in this case by
whomsoever drawn, necessary to its reception is the signature of a
Draughtsman at the Bar; and when the time comes that Evidence-Elicitator
is aggregated to the list of Argumentators.

Suppose now, what frequently is the case in both judicatories,
the individual demand one and the same, the fact alledged one on one side
denied on the other side one and the same, the evidence by which
support is given to the assertion by the one side, to the denial by the other side,
the same – still between still between the mode of elicitation employed in the Common Law Court and the
mode employed in the Equity Court are as different from one another as they can
easily be conceived to be. At the opening of the suit, evidence, consideration
had of its source, would not by a Common Law be received – evidence of a party –
is required to be elicited. Of this party-witness the station is on the defender's
side: and in the written mode, as above, an assistant of a party whose
station is on the pursuer's side, is employed to elicit it. But, the
statements thus elicited being destined to appear in the character of
evidence professing to be all along consonant to truth, the ceremony
of an Oath with eventual punishment at the back of it, is attached
under the notion of a security against mendacity. Here then would be
as in the case of special pleading a check to quantity: were it not that on
the pursuer's side, mendacity, and that without sting is not merely
tolerated, but absolutely compelled.

To a set of interrogatories the draughtsman is obliged to prefix,
to an extent to which there is no limit, a set of assertions which on
pain of not producing the effect intended by the interrogator, must be
false: for in order to obtain a statement in relation to a state of


Identifier: | JB/042/212/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

212

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

exemplificational

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e12a

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

"copd"

ID Number

13135

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk