JB/042/248/001

Click Here To Edit

1825 Jany. March 13
Constitutional Code.

Ch. XII. Judiciary Collectively
(3 § 4 Judicatories their Grades
§. 5 Numbers in a Judicatory
§. 6. Self-Suppletive practice
English practice

(1)

With all this redundence, but for an apposite provision
there might be deficiency to an unlimited amount might
have place. In this or that judicial practice, while human
inhabitants in the character of possible litigant or in that subject
of intestator from whatever cause spring up and multiply the
whole time of the judicatory though the quantity necessary is measured
by the — if the number of the Judges might still be
insufficient, and suits without decision might then in that same proportion accumulate. Against For evil in the shape there is but one
possible remedy, and that is an effectual one. To invest a power
to each Judge in an unlimited power of deputation. This accordingly
is the remedy which the employed in the present system: and how efficient
it is, and at the same time free from instant inconvenience
will it is hoped, be found sufficiently

(3)

Mention But whatsoever be the number of these Judicatories, each
with its single Judge, there is not any then to whom necessity for prosecution
and effect to his decrees but even for the making fixing of
just grounds for issuing framing them it may not be necessary to exercise
his authority over every inch of ground in the whole territory
of the State: and accordingly over the territory of any other
Judicatory or of any other Judges. Hence the of a universal
intercommunity of jurisdiction: accordingly of the leading
features of the present system there is one: and whether it be not
effectually cleared from all considerable inconvenience — at any
rate from preponderant inconvenience the reader of the Code or
penner of the Procedure Code connected with it will have to judge.

(2)

Suppose according to a commonly unsurpassed plan of
metaphysical decree, a say but three metaphysically
separated judicature the say the Civil, the Criminal, and the
Ecclesiastical: not to add as in Bonaparte's Code the and so on. The Civil
Judicatory Judge is overflowing with business: but the Criminal Judge though he has
most to nothing to do the Const Criminal Judge being tied down to his title instrumental within his ideal limit can
not
not render him if he would the smallest
assistance. At
Civil and Criminal are
both of them in like manner
overtaken. With
another three sits the
Ecclesiastical Judge. But as he is paralyzed by the same factitious . He may the decider, but he cannot remedy it: any more than a 1t Rate a Sixty
a who sees robbers
performing can interfere to stop it.

Identifier: | JB/042/248/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.
Date_1	1825-03-13	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	042	Main Headings	constitutional code
Folio number	248	Info in main headings field	constitutional code
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	e3
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	j whatman turkey mill 1824
Marginals		Paper Producer	admiral pavel chichagov
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1824
Notes public		ID Number	13171
Box Contents