xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/278/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

1824. April 2 +
Constitutional Code Copd

ulto
Ch. XI. Judiciary collectively
§. Intercommunity of
service

4

Art. 8. Where, if the order of the one Judge is executed, the
execution of the order an order of the other Judge is impossible, the
prevalence belongs generally to the order to which execution
Art. Cases will be to happen, in which
is first begun to be given, before it has been begun to be given to the other.
if execution to an order Judge on the
occasion of an
given of order of an order given by the this immediate Judge, on the
occasion of another such, would
In the precedence on the one side or the other necessity of the case requires that
of necessity
to those of the one or those of the other the preference should

be given.

Art. 9. Of the incompatibility thus brought to view
examples are as follows.

1. By an accessitive order of invading Judge, the attendance of a certain
person at a certain point of time at his judicatory was ordered is has been required.
By the invaded Judge, he being ignorant of such order, the
attendance of that same person, at that same point of
time at his judicatory was ordered by an order is by an appropriate order
of the same the same date. required.

2. By a prehensive order of the invading Judge,
for the purpose of providing securing the means of eventual
execution to a demand on the ground of debt, goods situated within the territory of the invaded
Judge were are ordered required to be prehended and
kept in custody: by a like order of the invaded Judge, for the like purpose
on occasion of the like a similar demand by another demandant those same goods are
ordered to be so dealt with in consequence of application at the same point of time
for the benefit of such demandant.
by Judicatory
by another demandant.




Identifier: | JB/042/278/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1824-04-02

Marginal Summary Numbering

8-9

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

278

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

"copd"

ID Number

13201

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk