JB/042/309/001

Click Here To Edit

1826. July Aug. 22

These pages I think
laid aside
A.M.

Constitutional Code. Ch. XII Judicatory collectively
S. Function command to all
§ 39Judges Elementary functions
Imperative universatized only
Conciliation Courts

Almost fit perhaps (these be ) to stand

Ratiocination

Arts Objection answered. The imperative is here
stated as function common to all Judges leading principles if to. The Concilation 1
Objection - imperative
function stated on necessarily
common to all Judges - why
more necessary than in
Danish conciliatory court
Court Judicatory invented in Denmark quietly applauded, in has been adopted
and employed in various other political states: in particular
in France by Bonaparte's Codes. This Of its beneficial effects
the following Table affords a practical demonstration. Admitting
what can not but be admitted that for a large portion of
the field of law and procedure, the imperative function must unavoidably
be given to the Judge in even the first enquiry, and that in
these Danish Judicatories and all the Judicatories derived from
then the epiculer decree given by the Judicatory is not of itself conclusive
but leaves the door open to an application to an ordinary Judicatory
in which the imperative function is added to the not - still
why not mutate an arrangement the usefulness of which has been
to the general satisfaction of nature been so adequately
demonstrated by expression? and accordingly why not employ it
in so far as employment has been in that case given to it?

2
Answer By proposed system
all the good done by
conciliatory courts will be
done & a great deal more
which they could not do

Answer. ByThe Judiciary system as here deluded with
the imperative function attached in every case to the other exercised
by the Judge will be done all the good which can ever here
been done by one of them conciliation Judicatures: and increase
a great deal which conditioned as they it has ever
been possible for them to do

In the first place comes the list of those suits to what it
was found unable to give termination. The number Comparative
with those to what it did for termination th small it is
true were they in number: but in comparative respect of the aggregate<add>even relative had to the pecuniary circumstances of the parties</add>, there is no saying
how great may have been the ratio of the small number minimals to whom
it was in that.

When without expence a chance for justice a chance were it ever so faint
was seen to be obtainable no ground of complaint so frivolous as not to
point the claimant to the spot where without any expence but that of men, and and without any part of the
vast load of expence, delay
and vexation which in
all other instances they use see
manufactured for the rate
of the profit this same chance
this view obtainable.

Identifier: | JB/042/309/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.
Date_1	1826-07	Marginal Summary Numbering	1-2
Box	042	Main Headings	constitutional code
Folio number	309	Info in main headings field	constitutional code
Image	001	Titles	ratiocinative
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	e1
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections	arthur moore	Paper Produced in Year
Notes public	"these pages i think laid aside. am"	ID Number	13232
Box Contents