xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/419/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

1825 Oct. 30 1825 Nov. 6
Constitutional Code

++ 8
Copd
8

Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively
§.20. Eventually-emendative
function

Individual amendment-proposers
Not for Netherlands

Not this time
for the Netherlands

Enactive (1)
Art. 19. Art. 20. Only for some alledged oversight in the
wording, in consequence of which the words employed
fail, is is supposed, of being expressive either of the
desire actually entertained by the draughtsman and the
legislature, or of the desire which it is believed would
have been thereby entertained by them, if and the circumstances
alledged as the mentioned as grounds or forming the ground or justificatory cause of the demand for the amendment
had been respectively present to their minds can any as it expected
that
only for amendments of this description is it expected that any
such proposition, if made, will be received by the Judge.

Transpose

(3) Instructional
Art. 21. Art. 22. Art. 18. If at any time in any Judicatory or p the law
such extraneous proposed amendments should encrease in number in such sort
as to occupy too much a greater portion of the time of Judges than can be conveniently
allotted for this collective
purpose, it will be
among the cares of the
legislature to repress
the excess by such conditions
as shall be deemed
apposite: for example by
requiring on every occasion
in addition to the applicant
one or more responsible Law practitioners
at his desire.

Art. 17. No such proposition is receivable unless
signed it has the signature either by Judge principal, or some Law practitioner
practising in the Judicatory to which it was submitted
over and above that of of
any by whom it is has been brought forward.

(2)
Enactive Ratiocinative
Art. 20. Art. 17. In the event of its being deemed frivolous
by the judge Immediate to whom it is submitted, but the
by accident or design the judge disposable time of the Judicatory
should be occupied in waste, and with or
without design delay or denial or considerable delay of justice be produced,
every person whose signature is attached to such
proposed amendment is responsible for it, satisfactionally
or punitionally, or in both ways, as the case may
require, the like manner as for a frivolous and vexatious
suits, as per Procedure Code. title Frivolous suits repressed obviated



Identifier: | JB/042/419/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1825-10-30

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

419

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

individual amendment-proposers / enactive / instructional / enactive ratiocinative

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1 / d8 / e8

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

[[notes_public::"not for netherlands / not this time for the netherlands" [note in jb's hand] "copd"]]

ID Number

13342

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk