★ Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
1825 Nov. 22
Constitutional Code
++ ++ 10
Copd
10
Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively
§.20. Eventually emendative
function
Individual Amendment proposers
23 Nov ☞ Compare this with §. Eventually emendative
Not this time for
the Netherlands.
Enactive. Instructional
Art. 25. Art. 22. In the exercise of this same eventually emendative
function, as well as in that of the melioration-suggestive function, the Judge
will have in consideration the question whether the local extent, to which
it appears to him proper to be given, to the any regulation by him
on that occasion proposed: whether the circumstances, by which the demand demand for
it is constituted, are peculiar to his own territory, co
to all the judicial territories of the State, or peculiar to such or such
other territory or territories: and if these distinctions
heard he will frame the of the bring to view, in Emendation- suggesting
or Melioration-suggesting Report.
Instructional Enactive. Ratiocinative.
Art. 26. Art. 23. On these occasions he will pay particular and separate
attention to the subject field of Procedure: inasmuch as it
is in this field more than in any other that incidents indicative of a demand emen for
amendatment or additional appellations will be apt to present themselves to his notice.
Instructional
Art. 27. Art. In these same distinctions reference
will moreover be made by the Judge Appellate, in the
Report made by him upon the Judge Immediate's Emendation
suggesting and Melioration suggesting Reports.
Instructional Enactive
Art. 28. Art. 24. 27. So likewise the Justice Minister,
in the Reports made by him thereupon to the Legislature.
Enactive. Instructional
Art. 29. Art. 28. Art. 25. On the occasion of any such proposed amendments
or new regulations on the subject of procedure,
the Justice Minister will have special regard to conform the demand
for uniformity as in the case of contested interpretations as
per §.19 Contested-interpretation-reporting function: to the end
that, in the particulars in question, uniformity and disuniformity.
that, according to the demand for them respectively uniformity
or disuniformity these qualities over the practical respectively, may, in the several judicial territories
of the State, be made to have place.
Identifier: | JB/042/421/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.
|
|||
---|---|---|---|
1825-11-22 |
|||
042 |
constitutional code |
||
421 |
constitutional code |
||
001 |
individual amendment-proposers / enactive - instructional / instructional - ratiocinative / enactive - instructional |
||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
d10 / e10 |
||
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1824 |
||
admiral pavel chichagov |
|||
1824 |
|||
[[notes_public::"not this time for the netherlands" [note in jb's hand] "copd"]] |
13344 |
||