JB/042/450/001

Click Here To Edit

1824. July 22
Constitutional Code

+
Corrected from the Copy 1
Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively
Copd (2 §.18. Preinterpretative function

5
Art. 5. Danger against which
Judge and Superordinators
will be on their guard: danger
of injury to other interests
for want of the opportunity
of contestation: those
interests not having been
sufficiently brought to view
by the application. The
danger is — best of
the species designated by
the one response and the
amendment the description
be so narrow and particular
as to be confined
to the individual and so
formed as to invoke in it
a decision re to some
matter of fact which would
be contested or so simple
as not to include some
exception or limitation
which the interest of some
other party requires or
point of justice requires
should be inserted

Art. 5. On this occasion, a danger an evil against which the
Judge and the several superordinate authorities would be on their
guard, is — that of the danger doing injustice to other parties interests whose interests, by some other
interest upon the statement given which by, or in consequence of the statement made by the applicant, may not
have been sufficiently been brought to view. [+] [+] The Judge will accord
[+] Accordingly No such preinterpretation
will the Judge
ever afford, without
having taken effectual
measures for preserving
all such interests from
being injured, for want
of adequate opp faculty
of contestation and
counterevidence. But Forasmuch as no by the determination
as to the species of object which on the sort of occasion in
question the law is to be understood to have in view, all that
the Judge will, in this individual occasion, have to guard against make sure of
is that of the species in question the description given shall
not be so narrow as to be in effect a designation of the individual:
nor yet the decrees or proceedings and as to this point if the Judge Immediate should
not be sufficiently on his guard, his superordinates, one or other
of them will not fail to be

6
Art.6 At any rate
in so far as the decision
is unfavourable to the
of the Applicant, and he
acquiesces, saved to
him there is the expence
and vexation of evidence
collection contestation of evidence
on the other side: to
adversaries, the correspondent
vexation and expence
with that of contestation on
the part of time.

Art. 6. the interest which is given be in disfavour At any rate, if, it be the response being in disfavour of the applicant,
that the response and the be the response
of the applicant, will be and the applicant acquiescent
by means of the present which of evil here, he acquiesces, here is a saving of evil
parties: on both sides: to the applicably the all/which are whatsoever vexation and expence that
would have accompanied the exhibition of evidence on his side, and the
contribution of the counter evidence on the adverse side. of those whose his adversary
interests are on the occasion adverse to his; to the adversary, the correspondent
vexation and expence,together with the addition of that of the attendant
that of the contestation on the point of law.

7
Art. 7. Against frivolous
applications, on this or
on other grounds, for
sinister purposes, such as
inflicting vexation on the
Judge, or extinguishing
evidence or delaying justice
as to some other sort by
engrossing the Judges time
see the provision made
in the Procedure Code [+]
[+] in proportion adapted to circumstances pecuniary mulet applied to Poor Litigants from as per. §. Justice to the poorest

Art 7. Against frivolous applications, made on this as on
other grounds, for sinister purposes, such as that of inflicting vexation
on the Judge, or preoccupying his time for the purpose
of extinguishing evidence or delaying justice in relation to some this or that other
suit or suits, provision will be made in the Procedure Code: and in p
proportions adapted to the circumstances of the delinquents, mulet pe
a pecuniary mulet, the produce applic paid into the poor Helpless Litigants
fund as per §. Justice for the Helpless. Art.11

This The Judge Immediate will accordingly be careful to take such effectual measures
as shall suffice to for preserving all interests from being required for want of on
the ground of partial statement and for want of adequate opportunity of contestation and exhibition of counterevidence.

Identifier: | JB/042/450/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.
Date_1	1824-07-22	Marginal Summary Numbering	5-7
Box	042	Main Headings	constitutional code
Folio number	450	Info in main headings field	constitutional code
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	e2
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	j whatman turkey mill 1823
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer	admiral pavel chichagov
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1823
Notes public	[[notes_public::"corrected from the copy" [note in bentham's hand] "copd"]]	ID Number	13373
Box Contents