JB/042/465/001

Click Here To Edit

1824. July 17
Constitutional Code

+IV
Ch. XII Judiciary collectively
11 §.16. Sistitive
§. 17 Emendatory
§. 18 Preinterpretative
Preinterpretation

25
Art. 25. Deficiency the
most frequent of the five
possible causes design
and inadvertence: most
frequent, inadvertence

Of the above four five modes of imperfection, deficiency
is perhaps the one most frequently exemplified: and where
it has place it is inadvertence is more naturally and frequently the ca
design the cause of it.

26
Art. 26. most apt
to be omitted.
1. Requisite exceptions
2. Requisite exemplification
(Correspondent subsidence
of deficiencies)
Evil effect of omission
if requisite exceptions
is imperfection, as to matter
of exemplification, imperfection, as to form.

In the mind of the many,
misconception or hesitation,
produced by the obscurity
left undispelled.
Evil effect in action, none,
if of the cases exhibited
in the exemplificatory
article, none are even
realised.

Of this mode agree want of omission of requisite exception,
and omission of requisite exemplification are perhaps it should seem
the two most frequently exemplified sub modes: 1. want of conception:
for want of exception this or that exception by which the
risk would have been confined within the pale of propriety — the rule
rendered in so far improper and pregnant with evil consequence.

27
Art. 27. Example of
inaptitude in the making
1. In this Code, any where
where the phrase Exception
excepted occurs, expect
an Exception: if it was
a useful one, the exception
will render
the general regulation
so far useful.

Of evil in this shape a particular and correct conception may be
conveyed without additional inscription of paper. In the present Code
as often as the phrase Exceptions excepted presents itself let the
risk as it then stands limited be applied for example correct
among say of an expunge any one of the exceptions it is thereby rendered
is so far incorrect. 2. want of exemplification. This
Imperfection in this shape may be considered as having place
in so far as any specific rules propositions which being in the customary import of the words and
the genuine rule proposition would have contributed to the remnant
of misconception or doubt, fail of having been inserted. Here
again the import may be fixt without any additional expence
of words. In the course of the preface proposed Code, many are numerous
the instances in which such exemplification stand expressed.
Let any one of them be supposed useful, contributory to the extension
of misconception or doubt, then expunge it, and imperfection in this shape
will by the supprestion be the result.

28
Art. 2. Want of exemplification.
Suppose
Take In any string of examples
If any addition to any other
case be found such that the
good from by the clearness added would
outway outweigh the evil.

[+] from the voluminousness, add it, and the remedy as well as the disorder stand exemplified.

Identifier: | JB/042/465/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.
Date_1	1824-07-17	Marginal Summary Numbering	25-28
Box	042	Main Headings	constitutional code
Folio number	465	Info in main headings field	constitutional code
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	e11
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	13388
Box Contents