xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/498/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

1825 Decr1 1831 July 9
Constitutional Code

+ + J 14
Copied July 28 Ch. XII
(3) (3 §. 45 Remuneration Attendance
Instructions

52 or 7 52
Two Standards of reference
for time to be allotted for
judicial attendance

Instructional

Art. 52 A Two standards of reference, applicable alike to all
government political states and all climates, are these and suggest the two following rules

53 or 8 53
1. In whatever department
the time number of hours occupied in
public service is the
greatest without prejudice to health that time
number should be
employed in the
judicial service

1. Among public
functionaries in the several departments, in all grades, from the lowest to the highest, whatever number of
whatever is the number of the days in the year, and of the hours in the day is established
in the as the regular are

whichsoever is the
class in which the
greatest

by custom or regulation, occupied in the public service by any individual without prejudice/detriment to health
that same number number is the the least which ought to be occupied
in the department of justice.

54 9 53
2 So in whatever
grade that number
of hours is the greatest
the same number
should be employed
in judicial service
the highest grade

Instructional

Art. 59. L In the instance of whatever grade, how low so
ever, without prejudice to health the number of days and
and hours hours of attendance on duty is greatest — as in the case of every other department, so in that of the Judiciary that same number may, without
hardship, be exacted of those functionaries whose situation
situation is in the highest grade.

55 or 10 54
If any difference more
time should be employed
in the highest than
in the lowest grades

Instructional. Ratiocinative.

Art. 54. If there were any difference, it is of the in the
case of these those the functionaries of the highest grade that the closest attendance
should be exacted. Why? because if even the pecuniary
part of the remuneration is not superior that which
consists in the po power and dignity can not but be so. For
the the contrary practice, so far as it has place, justificative reasons there can be none not be any:
Of historical or say exterlogical reasons there is
or in one word causes, — there is this obvious one: to wit that it is by the most powerful
classes the class that the proportions proportions have been determined:
those next in power to themselves are of course those which
are most favoured by them, to the prejudice of those all
below them still inferior classes.



Identifier: | JB/042/498/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1825-12-01

Marginal Summary Numbering

52 or 7 - 55 or 10

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

498

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

instructional / instructional ratiocinative

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c3 / d14 / e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

[[notes_public::"copied july 28" [note in benthams's hand]]]

ID Number

13421

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk