JB/042/533/001

Click Here To Edit

1827. May 25
Constitutional Code.

18
Ch. XII Judiciary collectively
(2 §.247. Judges Remuneration

See Education Minister — Ch. XI.

Ratiocinative

Fees
1
Fee payment recommended
in the case of Instructors
not in that of Judges
Reasons

Art. Objective Payment by fees recommended as per
Ch. IX Ministers collectively. § 16. Locable who etc. 47 to 50. Remuneration Art.
in the case of Instructors, yet recommended in the case
Judges — these opinion opinions are they, and if yes, how are they
recommended? in opinions thus opposite is there not an inconsistency?

2
Of reasons for condemning
fees in the case of Judges
not one in the case of
instructors

Answer. No no any. Of the reasons by which
in the case situation of a Judge, pay remuneration in this shape mode stands
considered there is not one that applies to the case situation of an
Instructor in arts-and-sciences: whether the instruction be
or be not accompanied with board and or lodging or both.

3
By giving encrease
to the number of the occasions
for receiving fees Judge
gives encrease to the
number of operations
performed — to the length
of the instruments issued.

1 By giving encrease to the number of occasions
in which by himself he has located fees are receivable, the
Judge the if he had it in his power to fees constituted
the whole or any part of his remuneration would by this
means have it in his power to give to his the aggregate of it an unlimited
encrease: that is to say by giving a correspondent encrease
to the numbers of the occasions on which the fees allowed would
be to be received: to the number of the operations performed — to the
number and respective lengths of the written instruments issued.

4
Thus by allowance of
judicial fees the interest
of the Judge in diametrical
opposition to his duty.

Thus it is that by the allowance of such fees in judicature
the interest of the Judge is placed in a state of diametrical opposition
to instead of with his duty: an arrangement by which
a bounty is given on the production of delay, expence and
vexation.

5
These not objections have
not place in the case of
instructors

In the case of the instruction in question in no one of the
diversifications of which in the and by the arrangements in question that
official situation is susceptible has the does the functionary instructor see it in his power to make any addition to the quantum
of his remuneration.

Identifier: | JB/042/533/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.
Date_1	1827-05-25	Marginal Summary Numbering	1-5
Box	042	Main Headings	constitutional code
Folio number	533	Info in main headings field	constitutional code
Image	001	Titles	ratiocinative
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c1 / d18 / e2
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	13456
Box Contents