JB/042/538/001

Click Here To Edit

1830 Feb. 12
Dispatch

T
Copied
7 §.2 Remuneration.

All this notwithstanding, the applicab practice of employing
the mode of remuneration in the case of a Judge is pure
and therefore in the case of an Equity Court Judge in particular
has been defended and recommended: such ground of defence
the exertion of which the mode of remuneration is alledged
to be productive. To this the to this alternate two

1. The alledged advantage, if it had place, could
not have place but in the instance of that the usual person to whose
whatsoever benefit it created by the Courts in question is sold.
it would not have place in the instance of the thousands to whom
that same benefit is denied. Here then is the most favourite supposition
here then is an advantage which is not worth a thousandth part
of the price paid for it.

2. In no one instance in the case of a Judge is any such effect produced
by it. If there were any such instance it would be by being
paid to him when while occupied in hearing pleadings viva voce pleadings in hearing
or reading papers belonging to the suit, and nor in this case
could be productive of the effect any further than as it give
by currency in proportion to the force of attention applied to him to
what be thus heard or read. But in no instance is any such
application made of it.

3. That which is thus impossible to be done by means
of the instrument the use of which is thus recommended, may be done
to a certainty by other means and without it. Can but the Judge
to sit in the p so it be in public in the place in which the
business is appointed to be done, the view or expectation of the public
will secure on his part the utmost existence that, in to punishment
for misconduct is capable of being produced; proportionate
the quality and quality of the audience being given, proportionate to the
strength of his existence will be expected by remuneration expected
by him in the shape of their approbatory, proportionate to the
slackness of his exertion, the punishment expected by him in that same shape.

Identifier: | JB/042/538/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.
Date_1	1830-02-12	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	042	Main Headings	dispatch court bill
Folio number	538	Info in main headings field	dispatch
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c7
Penner		Watermarks	b&m 1829
Marginals		Paper Producer	arthur moore; richard doane
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1829
Notes public	[[notes_public::"copied" [note in bentham's hand]]]	ID Number	13461
Box Contents