JB/042/558/001

Click Here To Edit

1825 Nov. 19 +
Constitutional Code

C 16
| ? Ch. XII Judiciary collectively
(1 §. 28 Locable who
Instructions and Rationale

1. Objections to strictness . For The strictness of the remuneration: there is
found the habit requisite on a Located Judge. Not that even the part
2. Reason 1. Natural publicity of expence 2. Unusual
emulation through notoriety

Number of hours may be varied according to climate.

Probative time mode Art. 14. 15
Principal will naturally choose the least experienced for the least important
suits

§ 23. On Locable who. Instructions and Rationale.

39 or 1
Strictness of attendance
on the part of Judge
Depute dependent on
his choice — on the choice
of any man who can
obtain the requisite
confidence on the part
of the Judge principal

Objection, strictness of attendance proposed. Answer
In the probationary situation of Judge Depute The strictness is left to every man's own choice — to the
choice of every man who at the hands of a Judge principal
can obtain the requisite confidence. In the situation of
Judge principal the strictness will it is true secured by the
connection established between pay and attendance, in which
case the inducement will be of the nature operates in the way of punishment
the species of inducement,
then operating upon
him, will be the exhilarating
motive
expectation of material reward

But antecedently to this will have been formed the requisite habit
of and that formed the product as just mentioned by the exhilarating motive. For the reasonableness of the means employed for
securing constancy of attendance see Ch. XIII Immediate
Judges Rem §§. Remuneration

40 or 2
Number of hours
of attendance varied
according to climates

As to the number of hours require here made
requisite to constitute the an attendance day, it may possibly
be found to require some variation corresponding
to differences in climate.

41 or 3
Publicity of exposure
necessary as a check
for requiring attendance

[Publicity of exposure] In the case of the Individual Service
Table the proposed publicity of exposure will be necessary
check when the operation of the Registrar in this case.
To obtain a present But for this check days and hours of non-attendance might
by the functionary be set down as days and hours of attendance.
In the English Court of Chancery under the eyes of
the Chancellor who has his profit out of it [] [] by the subordinate
Judges stiled Members, for attendances not
bestowed money is not only suffered to be taken by the agent of
the parties but extracted exacted by and for themselves. In the case of the
functionaries here in question, though the mendacity would not have money for its reward
it would have friendship
for an excuse.

Identifier: | JB/042/558/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.
Date_1	1825-11-19	Marginal Summary Numbering	39 or 1 - 41 or 3
Box	042	Main Headings	constitutional code
Folio number	558	Info in main headings field	constitutional code
Image	001	Titles	locable who instructions and rationale
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c1 / d16 / e1
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	j whatman turkey mill 1824
Marginals		Paper Producer	admiral pavel chichagov
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1824
Notes public		ID Number	13481
Box Contents