★ Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
1805 Dec. 20
Constitutional Code
Ch.XXVII. Local Registrars
Ch.XXVII. Local Registrars.
S.12 Post obit function
1.
Art. 1. Post Obit, already
in English practice.
Witness Post Obit Bond.
2.
Art. 2. Objection Anglice.
Too ample the trust to
be confided to a Local
functionary.
3.
Art. 3. Answer the English
System, minimum
of expence £5. exclusive
of of journeys.
4.
Art. 4. Consequence,
left without protection
of Law on this occasion
the property of the vast
majority.
5.
Art. 5. For fulfilment
against depredation &
negligence, sole security
a promise on oath
to deliver in an inventory
within a certain
time.
No further security
except by litigation.
6.
Art. 6. With this insecurity,
contrast the security
afforded by this
code.
1. To the Registrar, every
habitation with every
inhabitant will be
known by the Election
Code, Ch.
2. Time for giving in
the Judicatory Inventory,
may then be fixed
according to the individual's
circumstances.
---page break---
Ch.XXVII. Local Registrars.
S.12 Post Obit. function.
6 contind.
3. Power of disposal
being given to one, do.
of inspection may to an-
-other be subject to obstruction
- preventive
conditions.
4. Easy the comparison of
the effects with the list
of them.
5. Easy the provision
for the sale of such as
will not keep.
6. Witnesses all interessees,
friends, neighbours.
Every arrangement,
subtantive & adjective,
universally made known
by real laws, every one
would know what to expect
and what to do: every
one qualified to check
misconduct in the functionary.
7.
Art. 7. Objection 1.
True, in case of dissatisfaction
with his conduct,
sole remedy, demand of
redress from the Immediate
Judicatory; i.e. litigation.
Answer. But litigation,
from the benefit of which
no one wd. be excluded
by the expence.
8.
Art. 8. Objection 2.
True, different portions of the
property may be in different
local registrars territories
: thence, propertionably
multiplied litigation.
Answer 1. This a case
comparatively rare.
2. To exclude it will depend
on the proprietor.
3. No difficulty in each registrar's
taking this care of
the effects within his territory.
---page break---
Ch.XXXVII. Local Registrars
S.12 Post Obit function
Identifier: | JB/042/736/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.
|
|||
---|---|---|---|
1825-12-20 |
1-8 |
||
042 |
constitutional code |
||
736 |
constitutional code |
||
001 |
|||
marginal summary sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
|||
john flowerdew colls |
|||
13659 |
|||