xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/044/116/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

T

1830
Const. Code

The clause requiring a Senator not to be not less than 30 years
of age must not be omitted. Looked at a little beyond the surface this will be
found to belong to the category catalogue of Nugatory Securities – a catalogue of no
inconsiderable length in the field of legislation.

It is grounded on here theory – loose and superficial
theory – not only not supported by experience, but even opposed
by appropriate experience.

1. Under thirty years of age if a man is likely to be less apt
than a man above that age in some respects he is likely to be
more apt in other respects: & those of in which he is likely to be
most apt are of the greatest consequence.

In appropriate moral aptitude he is likely to be superior.
Why? because at the earlier age a man is more likely
to be influenced by generous social affections in displace of self-regarding
and dissocial ones, than at the more advanced age.
Youth in a word is the season of virtue.

2. For any deficiency in moral aptitude no abundance
in appropriate aptitude in any other shape can, there is
continual occasion to observe can atone: aggregate aptitude
instead of being increased is lessened by it.

But if appropriate aptitude in other shapes be
taken into account in one shape namely appropriate active
aptitude so far from being lessened lessened, if experience is to
decide it is increased by it. Scarcely had they exceeded the
age of 21 when Pitt and tax, — of the two parts, distinguished
themselves above their fathers, and became leaders.

3. A man under 30 is less likely to be chosen than a man above 30 and so
in general of two men so long as one of them is not arrived
at the age of caducity the elder is more likely to be chosen than
the younger. Why? Because whatsoever be the qualities that are
likely to recommend a man to preference on this occasion,
the older a man is, the longer is the time he has had for
bringing them to view. So in favour of Aristocracy rank and birth give this advantage.


Identifier: | JB/044/116/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 44.

Date_1

1830

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

044

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

116

Info in main headings field

const. code

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f42

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

13901

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk