xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/047/041/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

7 Apr. 1803
Evidence

As to the The considerations on which in point of reason in these cases the exclusion has been
grounded, they appear to be as follows –

1. The questions as by which the prior evidence was drawn
forth – the questions of the answers to which it is composed –
not chosen, any of the, by the party against whom the evidence
is now attempted proposed to be produced. Therefore whatever truth
may be contained in that mass of evidence, it is not the whole
truth – but only a part of the truth: and such part the tendency
of which will naturally be exclusively favourable to the
party by whose questions it was called forth – in so far as and
by whom the production of it is now proposed: unfavourable therefore to
the party by whom the production of it is now opposed.
Ground of the objection in one wordpartiality. And reason – The evidence partial,
being drawn forth by partial questions, put only on one side.

2. No opportunity of cross-examination possessed by the party
by whom on that account the production of it is now opposed.
Therefore no opportunity power of applying this most powerful of all
tests to the deparation of this already partial evidence.
Ground of the object in one word – want of scrutiny. Those reasons – The evidence
unscrutinized
.

3. In case of mis-statement – whether through unintentional
correctness or mendacity – no opportunity power on the part side of the
party now prejudiced by it, to encounter it by opposite
evidence, supposing such opposite evidence to be in existence.
Ground of this object briefly expressed – want no opportunity of counter contradiction: The evidence
uncontradictable
.

4. Danger of collusion in the first individual instance –
facility given to collusion in future instances – should evidence
thus circumstanced be admitted deemed admissible.


Identifier: | JB/047/041/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 47.

Date_1

1803-04-07

Marginal Summary Numbering

2

Box

047

Main Headings

evidence

Folio number

041

Info in main headings field

evidence

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

1800

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

14909

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk