JB/047/134/001

Click Here To Edit

28 May 1805
Evidence

Ch. Of the false end created by corresponding to the sinister interest of the Judge.
§.

The personal interest which any individual in the character of a
legislator ever have in adding to the evils opposite to the ends of
justice being conf nearly confined to the case of taxes
upon justice, the consideration of the false ends corresponding
to the general and sinister end of the legislator will be
confined to the chapter on that subject.

At At present let us consider speak of the most active and
efficient of all corruptive efficient of all principles of corruption that could have applied to the present case: viz. the sort of sinister interest to the actions of which while
sinister interests: that which the Judge has been permitted to
give himself with occupied in the formation and development of the existing systems of procedure the Judge has happened to be exposed: the sinister interest, to which was attached the its corresponding false end, augmentation
of the personal advantage of the Judge.

On this head three five subjects of inquiry invite our action.

1. In what through which channel way shape this sinister interest has be devolved allowed upon
1. In what way it happened applied itself
the Judge has made its way to the bosom of the Judge
1. Cause of corruption in the existing system of procedure: – siister interest on the part of the authors.
1. By the force of what principle of corruption it has happened that the existing system of procedure
were from the first to the last been directed to ends repugnant in general to the ends of justice.

2. In what ways the operation and tendency of the sinister
interest is such as seen in opposition to every end all the ends of justice,
to prompt recommend him to a course line of conduct, the effect of which
has been to give birth to every one without exception of the
evils opposite to those ends.

2. Interest which the authors of those systems had in the loading it in
as high a degree as possible with the evils opposite to the ends of justice.

2. Opposition of that interest to the several ends of justice.

3. In what ways in different countries under circumstances
more or less different the opportunity faculty power of perjury
with success safety and success the dictates the trade of this sinister interest has passed
from the hands of the legislator into the those of the Judge.

6. How for the mismanagement misconduct of the Judge in that respect is
to be referred to the action of this sinister interest and thence
to a vitious state of the will how far to a weakness intellectual imbecillity in the
state of the intellectual faculties.+ + ☞ This can not be discussed as yet? It depends on the arrangements themselves.

4. In what particular shapes and through what particular channels
the sinister and undue advantage in question is capable of finding its way to the bosom
or coffers of the Judge.

5. In these circumstances
5. What connection there exists
is in respect in the way of sinister
interest between the Judge
and other men of law and the other classes of
lawyers.

Identifier: | JB/047/134/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 47.
Date_1	1805-05-28	Marginal Summary Numbering	1
Box	047	Main Headings	evidence
Folio number	134	Info in main headings field	evidence
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	d1 / e1
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	15002
Box Contents