xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/047/195/002

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

PROCEDURE. Presumptions in favour of the acts of Subordinate Magistrates – and vice versâ and oitted rejected

(PRO. Adm) I
Q. v. Gouche – 2. Salk 441. in 4. Burn 115.
"Servants" Wages – In favour of Jurisdiction – that
the Wages "for work & labour in husbandry" were
Statute wages

K. v. Gregory. 2. Salk. 484. 4. Burn 115 – that
the Wages were wages in husbandry, as well as
that they were Statute wages.


---page break---

(CON. Reject.)
K. v. Helling. Str. 8. 4. Burn. 115.
Servants Wages – Indictment for not obeying an
order of Justices for payment of Justices wages
quashed, because the allegation and the Indictments did not bring the
case within their jurisdiction.

Dicta in K. v. Helling Clegg. Str. 475.
4. Burn 116.


Identifier: | JB/047/195/002
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 47.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

047

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

195

Info in main headings field

procedure presumptions in favour of the jurisdiction of acts of subordinate magistrates admitted & e contra

Image

002

Titles

Category

rudiments sheet (brouillon)

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] [lion with crown motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

15063

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk