★ Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
PROCEDURE. Presumptions in favour of the acts of Subordinate Magistrates – and vice versâ and oitted rejected
(PRO. Adm) I
Q. v. Gouche – 2. Salk 441. in 4. Burn 115.
"Servants" Wages – In favour of Jurisdiction – that
the Wages "for work & labour in husbandry" were
Statute wages
K. v. Gregory. 2. Salk. 484. 4. Burn 115 – that
the Wages were wages in husbandry, as well as
that they were Statute wages.
---page break---
(CON. Reject.)
K. v. Helling. Str. 8. 4. Burn. 115.
Servants Wages – Indictment for not obeying an
order of Justices for payment of Justices wages
quashed, because the allegation and the Indictments did not bring the
case within their jurisdiction.
Dicta in K. v. Helling Clegg. Str. 475.
4. Burn 116.
Identifier: | JB/047/195/002 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 47.
|
|||
---|---|---|---|
047 |
procedure code |
||
195 |
procedure presumptions in favour of the jurisdiction of acts of subordinate magistrates admitted & e contra |
||
002 |
|||
rudiments sheet (brouillon) |
2 |
||
recto |
|||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] [lion with crown motif]]] |
||
15063 |
|||