xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/047/283/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

10 Jany 1812
Evidence

Note (a)

(a) [Mendacity] Lest the general rule, as above deline indicated, should stand
(a) [Mendacity] Lest charitably with incorrectness for want of another defalcation –
not indicated a <add>defalcation, the need of which is indicated –</add>, not as in those cases by circumstances
of a local and temporary complection, but by the
original universally-prevailing and unalterable nature of things, the general
stand should still be found chargeable with
incorrectness,
mention could not here be altogether
refused to the narrow those that class of cases, narrow as the
description of it is, – in which the substitution of falshood
to truth being, by the principle of probity (taken in
that its largest sense in which that of humanity is
included in it) not only merely allowed but prescribed,
is by mankind in general and the
in their character of administrators of the force of
the popular or moral sanction, exempted in their view from that
confine, which attaches upon it in other cases. The
As for examples, the case of a madman or a malefactor,
requiring information for purposes of mischief,
will supersede the need of any other. Neither in virtue the
shape of veracity, or nor any other shape, virtue nor vice in the shape
of mendacity or any other shape, vice, being of any importance
but with reference to utility – to universal
utility – let falshood, as in the rare cases above-mentioned
be necessary to the prevention of mischief, falshood, instead of a crime becomes
a duty. But, the ground would upon examination,
be seen to be not inconsiderable in extent would the ground be seen to be, on which
while in respect of probity – i.e. regard regard for others duty towards
others persons – departure from the line of truth may be
matter of indifference, yet, by the rule of prudence;
i.e. by self-regard, it would be seen to be rigorously proscribed.


Identifier: | JB/047/283/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 47.

Date_1

1812-01-12

Marginal Summary Numbering

4a continued

Box

047

Main Headings

rationale of judicial evidence

Folio number

283

Info in main headings field

evidence

Image

001

Titles

note (a)

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d10 / e2 / f69

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

15151

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk