xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/047/301/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

6 Decr 1811
Evidence

§. 5. II. Shame

By punishment, the force one part of the force of the
political sanction is employed: in the character to the purpose of
against mendacity.
by shame, viz.
that the which a man is exposed to by detection or even
that to which a man is exposed to in this cause
by detection, by suspicion, the correspondent part of the force of the popular or moral sanction is applied applies itself to the same purpose is employed.

either of legal sanctions shame part of
universality extent of application
In respect of the extent
can <note> <note></note></note> to which they are respectively applicable capable of being
applied compared with punishment, shame has
one advantage. L For the application of it much
less evidence being , restraints as by the means necessary and could with degree effect
applied by it to mendacity in cases in which but mendacity thus experiences restraint in cases in which
for the mendacity would be altogether without instance(a)
it would otherwise experience none.(a) But Whether
it shall be safe in a less greater degree be exposed to
shame than to punishment, depends however in a more
direct way upon the individual circumstances than upon the species
of the case.

Note (a)
(a) In the recently established judicatures Courts of Natural Procedure recently established
in Denmark under the name of Reconciliation Courts, (Courts of natural procedure it shame is, or at any rate originally
was, the sole cause of restraint to the action of which testimonial
mendacity was subjected: neither punishment nor oath
were there employed: and the success has been such, as
to have struck off advantages by reduced to a
small faction the usual antecedently customary number
of causes instituted in the Courts of Technical Procedure.


Identifier: | JB/047/301/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 47.

Date_1

1811-12-06

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-2, 2a

Box

047

Main Headings

rationale of judicial evidence

Folio number

301

Info in main headings field

evidence

Image

001

Titles

note (a)

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d14 / e1 / f87

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

th 1806

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

andre morellet

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

ID Number

15169

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk