JB/047/340/001

Click Here To Edit

24 Novr 1811 Ch.10
Evidence

In the case of confrontation, the scantiness of its application
– as if there were any sort of case in which light
from all quarters were less conducive to rectitude of
decision than another – in the case of repetition as
well as confrontation, their conjunct inefficiency to every useful purpose,
in comparison of the security afforded by publicity
and open doors, will be brought held up to view.

In the case of Jury trial, Under the English mode, without the name and form,
be Jury trial, whether preceded or not by the preliminary examination
before performed by a Magistrate, the effect of gives in part the
effect, and, by a slight extension of the right of interrogation,
might be made to give the whole of the effect, of confrontation.
In regard to repetition, preceded by that such same preliminary examination, it gives a part of
reality or might easily be made gives actually part of the good effect, and might
easily be made to give the whole of the good effect, so
vainly aimed at by repetition when performed in
the close mode.(a)
Note (a)
(a) viz. by undequaque interrogation, if substituted to the partial
incompleat mode in use.
(b)

Of the process of information in developing at large the systems of confrontation and
repetition, one remarkable abuse will be occasion will present
itself for bringing to view a remarkable abuse in having place
under Romano-Austrian Law.(b)

Identifier: | JB/047/340/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 47.
Date_1	1811-11-24	Marginal Summary Numbering	4-5, 6 or 5a
Box	047	Main Headings	rationale of judicial evidence
Folio number	340	Info in main headings field	evidence ch. 10
Image	001	Titles	note (a)
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c2 / d15 / e2 / f126
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	th 1806
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer	andre morellet
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1806
Notes public		ID Number	15208
Box Contents