xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/047/361/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

29 Jany 1812
Evidence

7. In the close Rome-bred mode, the case where, as above,
the the individual on whom the operation of extinction by interrogation is performed be if a
subject an individual is examined – not in the character
of a party litigant but in that of an extraneous
witness
,
the questions, being which the examining
Judge is required to put, being on each side prepared
by a professional scribe, and (so it has happened)
distinguished from one another by numbers, some sort
and degree of distinc separateness and distinctness has
by this means, been in that instance, been given to the answers responses, of
which the mass of evidence extracted, from each such examinee
is composed: – some sort of preservative, more or
less efficient, against confusion, designed or undesigned.

In the case of the mass of evidence, delivered in the
and by the affidavit of each deponent, the use of the same principle
of distinctness, or at least of distinguishableness, might
be and rendered applicable employed with equal case. But,
the object quality aimed at having never been distinctness,
always undistinctness, the exaction of this principle of
distinctness is here has always been carefully avoided, observe as
it is although its tendency so it is, or rather been because it its tendency is so
obvious, the use of the principle of distinctness has always been carefully ob
avoided</del>
with the exception of the mala bonâ fide suitor, or where
the cause is happens to be such as affords them on both sides suitors
none of the persons, professional or official on whom the quality of the composition
depends having anything to gain by the distinctness
of it, many of them always by the indistinctness,
hence it is no wonder that this mode has in obtained the wonder
would have been had it not obtained, the favour so
exclusively bestowed upon it.


Identifier: | JB/047/361/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 47.

Date_1

1812-01-29

Marginal Summary Numbering

7

Box

047

Main Headings

rationale of judicial evidence

Folio number

361

Info in main headings field

evidence

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d21 / e6 / f147

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

th 1806

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

andre morellet

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

ID Number

15229

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk