JB/047/412/001

Click Here To Edit

3 Aug. 1812
Evidence Introd.

Of the conclusion in this case, the rashness, if it
were an honest one – i.e. if such were the opinion
really entertained – would be much more egregious than
in the instance last mentioned, viz. non-observance
in which, spuriousness or on the ground of
failure in the observance of this or that formality, a contract is convicted of unfairness
or or an instrument of contract of spuriousness.
– Population of England say ten millions:
numbers of persons capable of carrying on a suit or
cause in the least expensive Westminster Hall Court to a conclusion in the
least expensive Westminster Hall Court in the least expensive
place, not so great as half a million. To
the Defendant, capacity pecuniary power of continuance may be wanting
from the very first: and, more than as above, twenty to one but it is so
to the plaintiff, who can not be such but by his own
act, it will not be so from at the first: but, by accident
it may be rendered so at any subsequent succeeding stage. of the
suit or cause

Principal fact, want of merits: supposed pretended probative
fact, discontinuance: informative fact, by which the
equally preponderant probability of which the conclusion
is rendered erroneous, and the pretence false, want of
pecuniary power of continuance.

Identifier: | JB/047/412/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 47.
Date_1	1812-08-03	Marginal Summary Numbering	4-5
Box	047	Main Headings	rationale of judicial evidence
Folio number	412	Info in main headings field	evidence introd
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	e2 / f23 / f184
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	15280
Box Contents