xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/047/414/001

Jump to: navigation, search
In progress. Last edited by Kdownunder

Click Here To Edit

10 Mar 1803
Evidence

In those days a varnish of latinity served instead of rust to pass off a new
By a rule for an old one. By a fundamental
mental and by this time firmly settled fiction, there
was to be no such thing in law as a new case. Every new
case decision was to be taken for an old one. Each new decision
as it came to be pronounced was to be deemed and taken to have been
pronounced already. The legal cosmogony had taken one
of the physical systems of cosmogony for its archetype.
The phys world (the physical world I mean) began by
an egg; laid by an unknown bird in some unknown
time: in that egg was in the germ – in contained the germ of all things
and all events that are ever to make their appearance.
At this same time was brought into existing the system of English
jurisprudence, perfect in all its parts. As to The decisions
of which it consists are the decisions past present
and future to the end of time, were at that auspicious
period formed all at once: nothing what remains to be done
on each occasion is to find out what they are. All
interests all propensities concurred in giving currency
to that universal fundamental and not altogether inexercisable impositiion.
To pass for old it was necessary that each
new decision should be made as like to the old as possible,
and that the likeness should be doubled
if, identity was to be assumed. At the bottom of the
imposture remained after all, the golden rule Stare
decisis
– abide by existing decisions – the basis of good
judicature. It The light of reason and utility being
in those days alike inaccessible to all parties – lawyers
and suitors, the light of analogy, well or ill pursued, was the
most advantageous, and indeed excepted
the only substitute. To lawyers is saved lessened the to a
considerable


Identifier: | JB/047/414/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 47.

Date_1

1813-03-10

Marginal Summary Numbering

2

Box

047

Main Headings

evidence

Folio number

414

Info in main headings field

evidence essay on jurisprudential

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

1800

Marginals

john herbert koe

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

15282

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk