JB/051/202/001

Click Here To Edit

If the

If the laws of procedure were universally were what they ought to be and
what they might be, and what they nearly are
in so many unnoticed unheeded instances they nearly are, Attornies lawyers however
dishonest would be unable to do mischief: and
then whether they were willing or no would be
of mighty little consequence.

Another answers is that the argument on behalf in favour
of the monopoly given to Attorneys at
law were it to prove any thing would prove
too much. It would prove that the same monopoly
ought to extend itself over the other
species of Attorney, the Attorney who acts in
virtue of what is called a power of Attorney,
the Attorney ad negotia as stiled in France
and in a w short to all Agents and Factors
whatsoever. For giving the In this these cases the
argument in favour of monopoly would have
much greater force. An Attorney at Law acts scarce
slurs a step but along under the inspection of the Court: he presents all

---page break---

Identifier: | JB/051/202/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering	20-25
Box	051	Main Headings	evidence; procedure code
Folio number	202	Info in main headings field
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	f15 / f16 / f17 / f18
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::floyd & co [britannia with shield emblem]]]
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer	arthur young
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	16367
Box Contents