★ Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
13
Appeal
VI Quot 18 Complaints of delay require not a neighbouring Judge any more than Appeals, supposing the facts agreed on: if not, they require a Judge by commission Petitions for expedition, supposing the facts
on which the expedition is claimed order application is preferred on one side
and combated on the other, to be agreed on or
ascertained have as little need of a neigbouring
Judge as appeals properly so called: supposing
the facts to be in dispute, and consequently fresh
a necessity for the examination collection of fresh
evidence, the establishment of a neighbouring Judge Court of appeal or
power of giving a an occasional commission to a neig Judge of
an neighbouring Immediate Court is as necessary
in this case as in for this purpose as for that of a petition for supplying
a gap in evidence.
Were the ground <add>cause occasion of complaints of</add> for applying for expedition
and for supply filling up gaps of evidence
19 Complaints of delay and of suppression of evidence can never be enough to require a neighbouring Court of appeal for every immediate Court Were the occasion for complaints of delay
and suppression of evidence likely to be as frequent
as appeals properly so called there might be
as much ground nearly for a Court of appeal
in every territory of the extent of a District as
for an immediate Court. But this is evidently
not the case: so that the power of granting occasional commissions to
Judges of neighbouring immediate Courts will answer be sufficient for every
purpose for both these purposes.
Identifier: | JB/051/268/002 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.
|
|||
---|---|---|---|
18-21 |
|||
051 |
evidence; procedure code |
||
268 |
|||
002 |
|||
text sheet |
2 |
||
recto |
f13 / f14 |
||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[britannia with shield emblem]]] |
||
16433 |
|||