JB/051/289/003

Click Here To Edit

---page break---

13

Appeals

VII Curia para or only once it ought not it ought not to be subjected
to the delay of a second revision: if two revisions
are necessary this will not be rendered unnecessary
by the accident of a mans having commenced the action
in a Court of and more extensive jurisdiction instead
of one of a jurisdiction less extensive. True it is
that the need of revision will not be al in general
quite so great after the decision of a Court of
greater responsibility and intelligence such as
mine and the Committee's the District Court as after the decision of a Court
of less responsibility and intelligence such as my
Parochial Court and or the Committee's Canton Court:
but the difference does not seem so uniform and
decided as to warrant so striking an anomality
as the difference between one and two appeals in
the same cause, especially where the second appeal
can be given without additional expence.

4. A Court of Appeal may and ought to be always
sedentary. A Court of immediate jurisdiction must
under a rational system of procedure and is even
according to the still subsisting French system
for many purposes ambulatory: for the such as the taking views of
Land Houses and other immoveable objects, the examining
sick witnesses and parties and the like. If out

---page break---

Identifier: | JB/051/289/003 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering	not numbered
Box	051	Main Headings	evidence; procedure code
Folio number	289	Info in main headings field
Image	003	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	f11 / f12 / f13 / f14
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::l munn [britannia with shield emblem]]]
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer	benjamin constant
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	16454
Box Contents