JB/051/393/001

Click Here To Edit

Judicial Establishment

The reason of art. 28 is not at may not be obvious
at first sight but seems tolerably conclusive. If
every Judge-Depute Principal were exposed to the
danger of seeing a rival in his nominee, the
right of nominating nomination would carry with it a prohibition restriction
from nominating to nominate any person who was not of
talents not that were not palpably inferior to
his own. Extraordinary merit instead of being
a source of reputation would be a Anything
extraordinary in point of merit would be a sure
to ground of exclusion: and the object of prudence with
every Judge would be to choose find a Deputy of that
moderate of share of fitness negative measure of merit which might secure
the principal against being injured in virtue
of his responsibility by gross misbehaviour in the part of the Deputy on the one hand and by tro
successful rivalry predominant merit on the other.

As to the gradual system and the diffi
disadvantage under which Advocates of long
standing are laid by it, it forms as is evident
no an essential part of the plan. With
what degree of advantage it may be applicable to
that branch of government for which it was proposed
by the Count de Mirabeau it was not here my
business to enquire. It is pretty apparent I believe
that

Identifier: | JB/051/393/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering	8
Box	051	Main Headings	evidence; procedure code
Folio number	393	Info in main headings field	judicial establishment obs.
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	2
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	floyd & co
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer	arthur young
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	16558
Box Contents