xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/052/062/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

1824. Novr. 27
Procedure Code

Corrected all but 128
2

Ch VII Suits — their sorts.
§.8.6. Plurilateral and
Unilateral

Ch. VII Suits — their Sorts.
§.8.6. Plurilateral and
Unilateral

ǂ 11.
Art 11. Here, if the supposition
be that there is
but one suit, if there be
as many sides as interests,
there are as many
sides as Claimants:
or the suit may be resolved
into as many
elementary suits: in
each of which there may
be one pursuer, and
the rest all Defendants. (a)

Note (a.)
Illustration on the
supposition of four
Co-claimants.

Suits and claimants
suppose four. A.B.C &D.
Suit 1. Claimant and
Pursuer A Joint Contestants
& Defendants B.C.D
Suit 2 Claimant B.
Joint Contestants A.C.D
Suit 3. Claimant C
Joint Contestants A.B.D.
Suit 4. Claimants D.
Joint Contestants A.B.C.

12.
Art 12 Cause of the habit
of considering a suit
as having but two sides,
whatever be the number
of antagonizing interests.
The design of the suit
originating in some one
party interested, his endeavours
have naturally
been — to engage all those
to join with him whose
claims he regarded as
uncontestable, were it
only that they might share
with him in the expence
all who did not join with
him were of course made
Defendants — that by the Judge
they might be compelled
to submitt to him the
making the division, or
any distribution.


---page break---

Ch VII Suits — their Sorts.
§.8.6. Plurilateral and
Unilateral

13.
Art 13. Thus come to view
identity and diversity
as to suits.

Every separate demand
may be considered as
constituting a suit.

14.
Art 14. This admitted, in
every course of action,
ordinarily considered
as constituting the suit,
may be distinguished
as many elementary
suits, as these have been
made demands in the
course of it.

15.
Art 15. Examples.
1. All excretitious suits
that have grown out
of the original, as per §.6.
2. All Counterdemands
made on the Defendant's
side.
3. The demand, in consequence
of which, a
Quasi Jury Enquiry is
instituted.
4. The demand in compliance
with which,
Appeal is allowed.
5. Any demand by which,
after being instituted in
the one judicatory, a suit
is for any purpose brought
before another: for example,
for effecting forthcomingness,
for evidence on judicibilty execution
6. Each such suit may
be considered as resolved
into as many
suits as there are pursuers
in it.
7. So as to Defendants
8. The identity of a suit
may be considered as
destroyed, either by the accession
or the secession
of a party, on either side.


---page break---

Ch VII Suits — their Sorts.
§.8.6. Plurilateral and
Unilateral

16.
Art 16. Us of the division
of suits into
plurilateral and unilateral
— that the apparently co unilateral
being seen to be
suits proper for the cognizance
of a Judge,
the Judge, in these cases,
may be subjected
to the same checks,
as in other cases.
See Const. Code
Ch. XL. Judiciary Collectively
§. Checks.

17.
Art 17. Use of the exposition
in regard to identity
and diversity — that
upon no assumption
in regard to identity
or diversity, any pretence
be built for an
arrangement not conducive
to the ends of
Justice, as per Ch. II.

18.
Art 18. In particular, for
causing operations or
instruments to be repeated,
under the notion
of the extinction of the
suit: for example by
Death of a party.
Examples are various
in English procedure:
occasions and
pretences various:
ends & motives, the same

19.
Art 19. Particular use
in regard to succeeding
Stages of Enquiry
recapitulatory & appellate
1. In the recapitulatory
enquiry, all the excretitious
suits that can
have influenced the
decision in the original
suit shd be brought to
view: none that have not.


---page break---

19 contind.
2. So on the Appellate
Enquiry
But as, by the manifold
writing System,
the record containing
the whole proceedings
will be brought to view
in both stages without
fresh expence, the distinction
will apply not
to exhibition, but to
adversion observation: to the notice
that may come to be taken in the
course of argumentation.


ǂ Revise Art 11




Identifier: | JB/052/062/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.

Date_1

1824-11-27

Marginal Summary Numbering

11-19

Box

052

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

062

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

ch. vii suits - their sorts / plurilateral and unilateral

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d2 / e2 / f128

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1823

Marginals

Paper Producer

jonathan blenman

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1823

Notes public

ID Number

16735

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk