xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/052/095/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

h 1825. March 26.
Procedure Code

P I 1o
[C2] 85
Ch. VIII Judiciary intercourse
§. Defence, how procurable
III. Place.

Ch. IX
Defence how procurable
§§ II. Mode or Stile

or 1.
Art or 1. Place of Defendant's
attendance Experience of witnessing
for statement and examination.
1. Ordinary, a Justice
Chamber — Examination
judicatorial.
2. Extraordinary, a place
other than the Justice
Chamber.

or 2.
Art or 2 Judicatorial
place of attendance
is either —
1. Chamber of the Originiative
Judicatory
2. Of a Judicatory other
than the Originative.
say a Post originative

or 3.
Art or 3. Extraordinary
place of Defendant's
attendance examination is
either — Quere as in his
Dissenter statement?

1. Domiciliary, as in
case of sickness: or
2 Topographical, as
in case of his examination
on the occasion
of a topographical
judicial visitation
.

or 4.
Art or 4. For topographical
attendance

the time can not be
till subsequently to
the first judicial application
made to the Defendant.


---page break---

or 5.
Art or 5. Generally
place of Defendant's
accersition and
examination, the Originating
judicatory.
N.B. This, restrictions
excepted, will be at
Applicant Pursuer's
choice. But restrictions
are necessary, to
prevent overloading.
Reason 1. Certainty
of it being most convenient
to
1. Applicant
2. Not certain its
being less so to any
one else.

or 6.
Art or 6. But only
in one can the suit
be terminated.
Thence, special preponderant
inconvenience
expected back best
the originative.

or 7.
Art 7 or 7. Sole reason
for transfer, incidental
or definitive
to a post-originative
judicatory,
diminution of delay,
expence & vexation
attendant on the
accersitee's journey &
demurrage.
From this, the danger
of misdecision
would not be diminished
but encreased.
☞. Add Reasons.


---page break---

or 8.
Art or 8. Causes
of encrease of delay
expence and vexation
in this case
1. No date for Defendant's
next attendance
could be appointed
by the Judge
Originative: for the
first could not know
when the second
would have relative
leisure.

2 None, till in consequence
of a correspondence between
him and the Judge.
Post-originative
3. No determinate
information could
be given to the Pursuer
as to the time
of Defendant's statement
and testimony in this case

9.
Art 9 or 9. Nevertheless
power to Judge
Originative to make
transference, incidental
or definitive, to
a Judge Post Originative,
for special reason,
referring to delay,
vexation and expence.




Identifier: | JB/052/095/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.

Date_1

1825-03-26

Marginal Summary Numbering

or 1 - or 8, 9

Box

052

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

095

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

[[titles::ch. ix defence how procurable / mode or sha[pe]]]

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f85

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

jonathan blenman

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

16768

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk