JB/052/096/001

Click Here To Edit

1825. March 26 Revised
Procedure Code

1o
[C1] [C2] 86
Ch IX
(4 §. Defence, how procurable
Mode or Shape

Ch. IX
§. Defence how procurable
§§. II Mode or Shape

1.
Art 1. When the parity
addressed is not adducted
or accersed
to the original Judicatory,
if oral statement
or evidence is required,
(domiciliary or topographical
excepted,)
it must be at another
judicatory say a Post Originative, pro tanto,
here then will be transference.

2.
Art 2. Hence unavoidable
addition to delay,
vexation & expence.

3.
Art 3. Especially in
case of retromission.

4.
Art 4. Cause and measure
of the increase,
distance between the
Judicatories.

5.
Art 5. Cause of multiplication,
multiplicity
of persons accersible
whether Defendants,
Co-pursuers or Witnesses.

6.
Art 6. Judge of the Originative
Judicatory can
not make known the earliest
time of relative
leisure in another, as
in his own Judicatory.

7.
Art 7. Not at all without
previous correspondence

8.
Art 8. For obtaining Statement
and Evidence, parties
many, most eligible
made epistolary, backed
by subsidiary oral

---page break---

Ch. IX
§. Defence how procurable
§§. II Mode or Shape

9.
Art 9. The subsidiary
may be either
1. On the original enquiry
or
2. Reserved for the Recapitulatory
do.

10.
Art 10.II. Mode of communication,
oral or
epistolary. The Defendant
not being at the
time in question present
in the Judicatory,
the epistolary is the only
mode which, in the
first instance, the nature
of the case admitts
of: to wit, by Missive
sent to the Defendant
from the Judge. Remains
for consideration,
in which mode
the Defendant shall,
in the first instance,
on receipt of such
missive, address the
Judge. If in the oral
mode, it will be by
attendance at the Judicatory.

11.
Art 11. Where the originating
Judicatory
is the Judicatory of
all parties on both
sides, the mode of
subsequent judicial
intercourse will be
the oral mode.
Reasons. See them
in Ch. VI. Judge Applicating
Mode oral, Attendance
its uses.

---page break---

12
Art 12. Exception 1.
Epistolary, most conducive
to the collateral
ends of justice.

13.
Art 13. Examples.
1. Expatriation
2. The subsequent Post-Originative Judicatory
too distant
for accersition to the
originative.

14.
Art 14. Facienda by
Defendant on receiving
Judge's accersition
Mandate.
1. Sends Defence Paper
filled up — or Excuse
paper quoad hoc
2. Attends at the Judicatory
to fill it up.
3. Sends Defence Paper
provisional or and
definitive incompleat
to be filled up by him
on Attendance: or
Excuse paper quoad
hoc
4. Sends at any rate
Mandate receipt
acknowledgment

15 13 continued
3. The matter of the appropriate
response at the
maximum of simplicity
Examples
1. Defendant's acknowledgement
or denial of a document
purporting to be
his, whether in his handwriting
or not.
2. do of a statement
supposed to be orally
uttered by him
3. do of the receipt of a
Missive.
4. do of a death, with
circumstance as per Demand paper
5. do of a birth, with circumstance as per do.

Identifier: | JB/052/096/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.
Date_1	1825-03-26	Marginal Summary Numbering	1-14
Box	052	Main Headings	procedure code
Folio number	096	Info in main headings field	procedure code
Image	001	Titles	ch. ix defence how procurable / mode or shape
Category	marginal summary sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	f86
Penner	john flowerdew colls	Watermarks	j whatman turkey mill 1824
Marginals		Paper Producer	jonathan blenman
Corrections	jeremy bentham	Paper Produced in Year	1824
Notes public	[[notes_public::"revised" [note in bentham's hand]]]	ID Number	16769
Box Contents